Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Simple rules to minimise exposure to coseismic landslide hazard.

Milledge, D.G. and Densmore, A.L. and Bellugi, D. and Rosser, N.J. and Watt, J. and Li, G. and Oven, K.J. (2019) 'Simple rules to minimise exposure to coseismic landslide hazard.', Natural hazards and earth system sciences., 19 (4). pp. 837-856.

Abstract

Landslides constitute a hazard to life and infrastructure and their risk is mitigated primarily by reducing exposure. This requires information on landslide hazard on a scale that can enable informed decisions. Such information is often unavailable to, or not easily interpreted by, those who might need it most (e.g. householders, local governments and non-governmental organisations). To address this shortcoming, we develop simple rules to minimise exposure to coseismic landslide hazard that are understandable, communicable and memorable, and that require no prior knowledge, skills or equipment to apply. We examine rules based on two common metrics of landslide hazard, (1) local slope and (2) upslope contributing area as a proxy for hillslope location relative to rivers or ridge crests. In addition, we introduce and test two new metrics: the maximum angle to the skyline and the hazard area, defined as the upslope area with slope >40∘ from which landslide debris can reach a location without passing over a slope of <10∘. We then test the skill with which each metric can identify landslide hazard – defined as the probability of being hit by a landslide – using inventories of landslides triggered by six earthquakes that occurred between 1993 and 2015. We find that the maximum skyline angle and hazard area provide the most skilful predictions, and these results form the basis for two simple rules: “minimise your maximum angle to the skyline” and “avoid steep (>10∘) channels with many steep (>40∘) areas that are upslope”. Because local slope alone is also a skilful predictor of landslide hazard, we can formulate a third rule as “minimise the angle of the slope under your feet, especially on steep hillsides, but not at the expense of increasing skyline angle or hazard area”. In contrast, the upslope contributing area has a weaker and more complex relationship to hazard than the other predictors. Our simple rules complement but do not replace detailed site-specific investigation: they can be used for initial estimations of landslide hazard or to guide decision-making in the absence of any other information.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(VoR) Version of Record
Available under License - Creative Commons Attribution.
Download PDF (Supplement)
(2665Kb)
Full text:Publisher-imposed embargo
(AM) Accepted Manuscript
File format - PDF
(2614Kb)
Full text:(VoR) Version of Record
Available under License - Creative Commons Attribution.
Download PDF
(14290Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-837-2019
Publisher statement:© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Date accepted:11 March 2019
Date deposited:12 March 2019
Date of first online publication:17 April 2019
Date first made open access:No date available

Save or Share this output

Export:
Export
Look up in GoogleScholar