Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Evidence for a 200 km thick diamond-bearing root beneath the Central Mackenzie Valley, Northwest Territories, Canada? Diamond indicator mineral geochemistry from the Horn Plateau and Trout Lake regions.

Poitras, Stéphane P. and Pearson, D. Graham and Hardman, Matthew F. and Stachel, Thomas and Nowell, Geoff M. and Cairns, Scott (2018) 'Evidence for a 200 km thick diamond-bearing root beneath the Central Mackenzie Valley, Northwest Territories, Canada? Diamond indicator mineral geochemistry from the Horn Plateau and Trout Lake regions.', Mineralogy and petrology., 112 (S2). pp. 719-736.

Abstract

The Central Mackenzie Valley (CMV) area of Northwest Territories is underlain by Precambrian basement belonging to the North American Craton. The potential of this area to host kimberlitic diamond deposits is relatively high judging from the seismologically-defined lithospheric thickness, age of basement rocks (2.2–1.7 Ga) and presence of kimberlite indicator minerals (KIMs) in Quaternary sediments. This study presents data for a large collection of KIMs recovered from stream sediments and till samples from two study areas in the CMV, the Horn Plateau and Trout Lake. In the processed samples, peridotitic garnets dominate the KIM grain count for both regions (> 25% each) while eclogitic garnet is almost absent in both regions (< 1% each). KIM chemistry for the Horn Plateau indicates significant diamond potential, with a strong similarity to KIM systematics from the Central and Western Slave Craton. The most significant issue to resolve in assessing the local diamond potential is the degree to which KIM chemistry reflects local and/or distal kimberlite bodies. Radiogenic isotope analysis of detrital kimberlite-related CMV ilmenite and rutile grains requires at least two broad age groups for eroded source kimberlites. Statistical analysis of the data suggests that it is probable that some of these KIMs were derived from primary and/or secondary sources within the CMV area, while others may have been transported to the area from the east-northeast by Pleistocene glacial and/or glaciofluvial systems. At this stage, KIM chemistry does not allow the exact location of the kimberlitic source(s) to be constrained.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF
(2428Kb)
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF
(3978Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00710-018-0641-4
Publisher statement:This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Mineralogy and petrology. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00710-018-0641-4
Date accepted:03 October 2018
Date deposited:15 March 2019
Date of first online publication:27 October 2018
Date first made open access:27 October 2019

Save or Share this output

Export:
Export
Look up in GoogleScholar