We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Durham Research Online
You are in:

Religious adjudication and the European Convention on Human Rights.

Leigh, Ian (2019) 'Religious adjudication and the European Convention on Human Rights.', Oxford journal of law and religion., 8 (1). pp. 1-27.


Despite extensive discussion of the desirability of recognition of religious law in Europe in recent years and widespread agreement among commentators that the precondition for any such recognition must be respect for human rights, there has little detailed analysis of what this would entail. This article aims to redress that omission by a systematic discussion of the compatibility of various forms of religious adjudication with the European Convention on Human Rights. It first clarifies the conceptual confusion surrounding the relationship between state law and religious adjudication, especially where voluntary non-binding adjudication is concerned. It then applies the relevant Convention jurisprudence (drawing especially on the recent Grand Chamber decision of the European Court of Human Rights in Molla Sali v Greece) to identify two relevant tests of compatibility. These are, respectively, the adequacy of judicial scrutiny and voluntariness or consent.

Item Type:Article
Keywords:Religious adjudication, human rights, ECHR, religious law, Sharia Councils.
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF
Publisher Web site:
Publisher statement:This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Oxford journal of law and religion following peer review. The version of record Leigh, Ian (2019). Religious Adjudication and the European Convention on Human Rights. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 8(1): 1-27 is available online at:
Date accepted:17 March 2019
Date deposited:19 March 2019
Date of first online publication:21 April 2019
Date first made open access:21 April 2021

Save or Share this output

Look up in GoogleScholar