We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Durham Research Online
You are in:

Forgiveness in leader–member exchange relationships : mediating and moderating mechanisms.

Epitropaki, O. and Legood, A. and Thomas, G. and Radulovic, A.B. (2019) 'Forgiveness in leader–member exchange relationships : mediating and moderating mechanisms.', Journal of occupational and organizational psychology., 92 (3). pp. 498-534.


Guided by the relationship science literature, we developed and tested a model of forgiveness in LMX relationships across three independent studies. Study 1 utilized a sample of 254 employees from eight organizations located in four countries and showed that higher quality LMX led to higher job satisfaction and subjective well-being via greater follower’s forgiveness and subsequent follower’s relational efforts. Building on Study 1, Study 2 (N = 95) adopted an experimental scenario design in order to examine the association between LMX and forgiveness as well as the moderating role of forgiveness climate. LMX was found to positively affect forgiveness and forgiveness climate was found to be a significant moderator. Study 3 was a time-lagged study that utilised a sample of 262 working professionals in the US and provided support for our hypothesized model. Overall, our three studies cast light on forgiveness processes in LMX relationships and show that forgiveness can be used as a relationship maintenance strategy that yields positive outcomes.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF
Publisher Web site:
Publisher statement:This is the accepted version of the following article: Radulovic, A.B., Thomas, G., Epitropaki, O. & Legood, A. (2019). Forgiveness in Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Relationships: Mediating and Moderating Mechanisms. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 92(3): 498-534, which has been published in final form at This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.
Date accepted:16 April 2019
Date deposited:01 May 2019
Date of first online publication:15 May 2019
Date first made open access:15 May 2020

Save or Share this output

Look up in GoogleScholar