Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

The European Epidemic: pain prevalence and socioeconomic inequalities in pain across 19 European countries

Todd, Adam; McNamara, Courtney L.; Balaj, Mirza; Huijts, Tim; Akhter, Nasima; Thomson, Katie; K*asim, Adetayo; Eikemo, Terje A; Bambra, Clare

The European Epidemic: pain prevalence and socioeconomic inequalities in pain across 19 European countries Thumbnail


Authors

Adam Todd

Courtney L. McNamara

Mirza Balaj

Tim Huijts

Katie Thomson

Adetayo K*asim

Terje A Eikemo

Clare Bambra



Contributors

AS Kasim a.s.kasim@durham.ac.uk
Other

Abstract

Background: Using data from the European Social Survey (ESS) 2014, this study presents an update of pain prevalence amongst men and women across Europe and undertakes the first analysis of socioeconomic inequalities in pain. Methods: Data from the ESS 2014 survey were analysed for three pain variables: back/neck pain (n=11,032), arm/hand pain (n=5,954), and foot/leg pain (n=6,314). Education was used as the indicator of socio‐economic status (SES). Age adjusted risk differences (ARD) and age adjusted risk ratios (ARR) were calculated from predicted probabilities generated by means of binary logistic regression. These analyses compared the lower education group with the higher education group (the socioeconomic gap), and the medium education group with the higher education group (the gradient). Results: High prevalence rates were reported for all three types of pain across European countries. At a pan‐European level, back/neck pain was the most prevalent with 40% of survey participants experiencing pain; then hand/arm pain at 22%, and then foot/leg pain at 21%. There was considerable cross‐national variation in pain across European counties, as well as are significant socio‐economic inequalities in the prevalence of pain – with social gradients or socio‐economic gaps evident for both men and women; socio‐economic inequalities were most pronounced for hand/arm pain, and least pronounced for back/neck pain. The magnitudes of the socioeconomic pain inequalities differed between countries, but were generally higher for women. Conclusions: Future strategies to reduce the burden of pain should acknowledge and consider the associated socioeconomic inequalities of pain to ensure the ‘pain gap’ does not widen.

Citation

Todd, A., McNamara, C. L., Balaj, M., Huijts, T., Akhter, N., Thomson, K., …Bambra, C. (2019). The European Epidemic: pain prevalence and socioeconomic inequalities in pain across 19 European countries. European Journal of Pain, 23(8), 1425-1436. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1409

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Apr 21, 2019
Online Publication Date Apr 30, 2019
Publication Date Sep 1, 2019
Deposit Date May 7, 2019
Publicly Available Date Apr 30, 2020
Journal European Journal of Pain
Print ISSN 1090-3801
Electronic ISSN 1532-2149
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 23
Issue 8
Pages 1425-1436
DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1409

Files

Accepted Journal Article (1 Mb)
PDF

Copyright Statement
This is the accepted version of the following article: Todd, Adam, McNamara, Courtney L., Balaj, Mirza, Huijts, Tim, Akhter, Nasima, Thomson, Katie, Kasim, Adetayo, Eikemo, Terje A & Bambra, Clare (2019). The European Epidemic: pain prevalence and socioeconomic inequalities in pain across 19 European countries. European Journal of Pain 23(8): 1425-1436 which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1409. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.





You might also like



Downloadable Citations