Dr Andy Hayward a.p.hayward@durham.ac.uk
Associate Professor
Equal Civil Partnerships, Discrimination and the Indulgence of Time: R (on the application of Steinfeld and Keidan) v Secretary of State for International Development
Hayward, A.
Authors
Abstract
In R (on the application of Steinfeld and Keidan) v Secretary of State for International Development the Supreme Court unanimously declared that the ban on different‐sex civil partnerships was incompatible with Articles 8 and 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights. In a strikingly robust and, at times, acerbic manner, the Court systematically dismantled the Secretary of State's request for tolerance of a discriminatory and unsustainable legal position. The decision represents a clear victory for those campaigning for reform and the issuing of a declaration of incompatibility by the Court is likely to have influenced the later announcement by Prime Minister Theresa May in October 2018 that different‐sex civil partnerships will ultimately be introduced in England and Wales.
Citation
Hayward, A. (2019). Equal Civil Partnerships, Discrimination and the Indulgence of Time: R (on the application of Steinfeld and Keidan) v Secretary of State for International Development. Modern Law Review, 82(5), 922-935. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12437
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Feb 21, 2019 |
Online Publication Date | May 20, 2019 |
Publication Date | Jan 1, 2019 |
Deposit Date | Feb 26, 2019 |
Publicly Available Date | May 20, 2020 |
Journal | Modern Law Review |
Print ISSN | 0026-7961 |
Publisher | Wiley |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 82 |
Issue | 5 |
Pages | 922-935 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12437 |
Files
Accepted Journal Article
(516 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
This is the accepted version of the following article: Hayward, A. (2019). Equal Civil Partnerships, Discrimination and the Indulgence of Time: R (on the application of Steinfeld and Keidan) v Secretary of State for International Development. Modern Law Review 82(5): 922-935., which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12437. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.
You might also like
Cohabitation Reform in England and Wales: Time for Action
(2024)
Book Chapter
Burns v Burns: The Fable Forty Years On
(2024)
Book Chapter
Research Handbook on Family Property and the Law
(2023)
Book
Cohabitation and Labour's Commitment to Changing the Law: What Reform Might Look Like
(2023)
Digital Artefact
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search