Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Evident black hole-bulge coevolution in the distant universe.

Yang(杨光), G. and Brandt, W. N. and Alexander, D. M. and Chen(陳建廷), C-T. J. and Ni(倪清泠), Q. and Vito, F. and Zhu(朱飞凡), F-F. (2019) 'Evident black hole-bulge coevolution in the distant universe.', Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society., 485 (3). pp. 3721-3737.

Abstract

Observations in the local universe show a tight correlation between the masses of supermassive black holes (SMBHs; MBH) and host-galaxy bulges (Mbulge), suggesting a strong connection between SMBH and bulge growth.However, direct evidence for such a connection in the distant universe remains elusive. We have studied sample-averaged SMBH accretion rate (BHAR) for bulge-dominated galaxies at z = 0.5–3. While previous observations found BHAR is strongly related to host-galaxy stellar mass (M) for the overall galaxy population, our analyses show that, for the bulge-dominated population, BHAR is mainly related to SFR rather than M. This BHAR–SFR relation is highly significant, e.g. 9.0σ (Pearson statistic) at z = 0.5–1.5. Such a BHAR–SFR connection does not exist among our comparison sample of galaxies that are not bulge dominated, for which M appears to be the main determinant of SMBH accretion. This difference between the bulge-dominated and comparison samples indicates that SMBHs only coevolve with bulges rather than the entire galaxies, explaining the tightness of the local MBH−Mbulge correlation. Our best-fitting BHAR–SFR relation for the bulge-dominated sample is logBHAR = log SFR − (2.48 ± 0.05) (solar units). The best-fitting BHAR/SFR ratio (10−2.48) for bulge-dominated galaxies is similar to the observed MBH/Mbulge values in the local universe. Our results reveal that SMBH and bulge growth are in lockstep, and thus non-causal scenarios of merger averaging are unlikely the origin of the MBH−Mbulge correlation. This lockstep growth also predicts that the MBH−Mbulge relation should not have strong redshift dependence.

Item Type:Article
Full text:Publisher-imposed embargo
(VoR) Version of Record
File format - PDF
(316Kb)
Full text:(VoR) Version of Record
Download PDF
(2424Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz611
Publisher statement:This article has been accepted for publication in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society ©: 2019 The Author[s]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
Date accepted:26 February 2019
Date deposited:30 July 2019
Date of first online publication:02 March 2019
Date first made open access:No date available

Save or Share this output

Export:
Export
Look up in GoogleScholar