Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Exercise interventions for preventing and treating low bone mass in the forearm : a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Forsyth, J. and Evans, A. and Hind, K. and Paskins, Z. and Babatunde, O. (2020) 'Exercise interventions for preventing and treating low bone mass in the forearm : a systematic review and meta-analysis.', Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation., 101 (3). pp. 487-511.

Abstract

Objective: To examine the effectiveness of exercises for improving forearm bone mass. Data Sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched from their inception until December 2018. Study Selection: Eligibility included adults undertaking upper limb exercise interventions (≥12wk) to improve bone mass. Data Extraction: Screening of titles, abstracts, and full texts and data extraction were undertaken independently by pairs of reviewers. Included studies were quality appraised using Cochrane risk of bias tool. Data Synthesis: Exercise interventions were classified into “resistance training” of high or low intensity (HIRT/LIRT, respectively) or “impact.” Random-effects meta-analysis of the percentage change in forearm bone mass from baseline was conducted. Twenty-six studies were included in the review, of which 21 provided suitable data for meta-analysis. Methodological quality ranged from “low” to “unclear” risk of bias. Exercise generally led to increases (moderate-quality evidence) in forearm bone mass (standard mean difference [SMD], 1.27; 95% CI, 0.66-1.88; overall effect Z value=4.10; P<.001). HIRT (SMD, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.37-1.62; Z value=3.11; P=.002), and LIRT (SMD, 2.36; 95% CI, 0.37-4.36; Z value=2.33; P<.001) led to moderate increases in forearm bone mass. Improvements resulting from impact exercises (SMD, 1.12; 95% CI, −1.27 to 3.50; Z value=0.92; P=.36) were not statistically significant (low-quality evidence). Conclusions: There is moderate-quality evidence that exercise is effective for improving forearm bone mass. There is moderate-quality evidence that upper body resistance exercise (HIRT/LIRT) promotes forearm bone mass but low-quality evidence for impact exercise. Current evidence is equivocal regarding which exercise is most effective for improving forearm bone mass.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Available under License - Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
Download PDF
(536Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2019.07.007
Publisher statement:© 2019 This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Date accepted:16 July 2019
Date deposited:06 August 2019
Date of first online publication:26 August 2019
Date first made open access:26 August 2020

Save or Share this output

Export:
Export
Look up in GoogleScholar