Martin, Joseph D. (2015) 'What’s in a name change?', Physics in perspective., 17 (1). pp. 3-32.
When solid state physics emerged in the 1940s, its name was controversial. By the 1970s, some physicists came to prefer “condensed matter” as a way to identify the discipline of physics examining complex matter. Physicists and historians often gloss this transition as a simple rebranding of a problematically named field, but attention to the motives behind these names reveals telling nuances. “Solid state physics” and “condensed matter physics”—along with “materials science,” which also emerged during the Cold War—were named in accordance with ideological commitments about the identity of physics. Historians, therefore, can profitably understand solid state and condensed matter physics as distinct disciplines. Condensed matter, rather than being continuous with solid state physics, should be considered alongside materials science as an outlet for specific frustrations with the way solid state was organized.
|Full text:||(AM) Accepted Manuscript|
Download PDF (279Kb)
|Publisher Web site:||https://doi.org/10.1007/s00016-014-0151-7|
|Publisher statement:||This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Physics in Perspective. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00016-014-0151-7|
|Date accepted:||No date available|
|Date deposited:||27 September 2019|
|Date of first online publication:||08 January 2015|
|Date first made open access:||No date available|
Save or Share this output
|Look up in GoogleScholar|