Van Leeuwen, Barend (2020) 'Free movement of life? The interaction between the best interests test and the right to freely receive services in Tafida Raqeeb.', Public law. . pp. 398-408.
Comments on Raqeeb v Barts NHS Foundation Trust (Admin) on whether parents had the right to take their child to Italy for continuing care after UK doctors recommended that treatment be withdrawn. Discusses the distinction between the best interests test and judicial review, and whether the hospital's refusal to transfer the child after a finding that it was in her best interests to be treated elsewhere breached her free movement rights.
|Full text:||(AM) Accepted Manuscript|
Download PDF (199Kb)
|Publisher Web site:||https://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/Catalogue/ProductDetails.aspx?productid=30791427&recordid=469|
|Publisher statement:||This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Public Law following peer review. The definitive published version Van Leeuwen, Barend (2020). Free Movement of Life? The Interaction Between the Best Interests Test and the Right to Freely Receive Services in Tafida Raqeeb. Public Law 398-408 is available online on Westlaw UK or from Thomson Reuters DocDel service.|
|Date accepted:||02 December 2019|
|Date deposited:||02 December 2019|
|Date of first online publication:||2020|
|Date first made open access:||20 December 2019|
Save or Share this output
|Look up in GoogleScholar|