Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Injustice and collectivization in world politics.

Kahn, Elizabeth (2019) 'Injustice and collectivization in world politics.', Global justice : theory practice rhetoric., 11 (2). pp. 29-50.

Abstract

In Justice and Reconciliation in World Politics Catherine Lu endorses the idea that those who contribute to the reproduction of structural injustice have responsibilities to address that injustice (Lu, 2017). However, in the book, Lu does not explore the grounds and justification for recognising such a responsibility. In order to address this deficit, this paper proposes that those likely to contribute to the reproduction of structural injustice, in the future, have precautionary duties, in the present, that require them to take action aimed at preventing their future contribution. It is proposed that these ‘collectivization duties’ (Collins, 2013) require them to act responsively with a view to forming a collective that can end the structural injustice in question. This account recommends a collective-action solution alongside recognising that each socially connected agent is obliged to act. However, it does not entail that amorphous groups bear responsibilities and is appropriate in its attribution of blame, thus avoiding both Nussbaum’s (2011) critique of perpetually forward-looking accounts and the ‘agency objection’ (Wringe, 2010).

Item Type:Article
Full text:(VoR) Version of Record
Download PDF
(234Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:https://doi.org/10.21248/gjn.11.02.217
Publisher statement:Global Justice: Theory Practice Rhetoric (TPR) adheres to the Budapest Open Access Initiative definition of open access, according to which users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles. Users also have the right to crawl the texts for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself. Creating derivative works is not covered by the BOAI, and is thus subject to permission from the Global Justice Network.
Date accepted:No date available
Date deposited:05 December 2019
Date of first online publication:25 November 2019
Date first made open access:05 December 2019

Save or Share this output

Export:
Export
Look up in GoogleScholar