Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Consumption ethics: A Review and Analysis of Future Directions for Interdisciplinary Research.

Carrington, M. and Chatzidakis, A. and Goworek, H. and Shaw, D. (2020) 'Consumption ethics: A Review and Analysis of Future Directions for Interdisciplinary Research.', Journal of business ethics., 168 (2). pp. 215-238.

Abstract

The terminology employed to explore consumption ethics, the counterpart to business ethics, is increasingly varied not least because consumption has become a central discourse and area of investigation across disciplines (e.g. Graeber, 2011). Rather than assuming interchangeability, we argue that these differences signify divergent understandings and contextual nuances and should, therefore, inform future writing and understanding in this area. Accordingly, this article advances consumer ethics scholarship through a systematic review of the current literature that identifies key areas of convergence and contradiction. We then present the articles in this Journal of Business Ethics Symposium and analyse how these articles fit within the interdisciplinary themes. Subsequently, we develop a transdisciplinary theoretical framework that encapsulates the complexity and contextual nature of consumption ethics. We conclude by outlining how genuinely transdisciplinary research into the intersection of ethics with consumption may develop.

Item Type:Article
Additional Information:A correction to this article was published on 13 March 2020: In the published article the Acknowledgment section is missing. The following text should have been included: Acknowledgement The authors were supported by ESRC Seminar Series funding under award ES/M002446/1 in a series entitled ‘Ethics in Consumption: Interdisciplinary Perspectives’. The original version can be found at: https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10551-020-04425-4
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF
(342Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04473-w
Publisher statement:This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Journal of Business Ethics. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04425-4
Date accepted:28 December 2019
Date deposited:16 January 2020
Date of first online publication:18 January 2020
Date first made open access:18 January 2021

Save or Share this output

Export:
Export
Look up in GoogleScholar