Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Liquidity risk exposure and its determinants in the banking sector : a comparative analysis between Islamic, conventional and hybrid banks.

Mohammad, Sabri and Asutay, Mehmet and Dixon, Rob and Platonova, Elena (2020) 'Liquidity risk exposure and its determinants in the banking sector : a comparative analysis between Islamic, conventional and hybrid banks.', Journal of international financial markets, institutions and money., 66 . p. 101196.

Abstract

This study aims to explore and examine the liquidity risk that Islamic banks are exposed to in a comparison with conventional and hybrid banks in the case of 145 commercial banks for the period of 1996–2015. This study also examines the factors determining the liquidity risk exposure of the sampled banks by employing a panel data regression model with the random effect technique by considering bank specification, macroeconomy, governance and ownership-related variables. The findings for the sampled banks demonstrate that Islamic banks are more exposed to liquidity risk than conventional and hybrid banks. In addition, the results show that the stringency of capital regulations and credit risk have a negative and significant impact on liquidity risk. Moreover, the results demonstrate that liquid assets and long-term debts are positively associated with liquidity risk exposure. While the empirical results show that long-term debt significantly affects liquidity risk, the results indicate an insignificant impact of liquid assets on the liquidity risk exposure of the sampled banks. The results also depict that bank size, governance and ownership concentration as well as GDP are important control variables in reducing the liquidity risk exposure of Islamic banks.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Available under License - Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
Download PDF
(669Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2020.101196
Publisher statement:© 2020 This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Date accepted:28 February 2020
Date deposited:14 April 2020
Date of first online publication:12 April 2020
Date first made open access:12 April 2021

Save or Share this output

Export:
Export
Look up in GoogleScholar