We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Durham Research Online
You are in:

The Milky Way total mass profile as inferred from Gaia DR2.

Cautun, Marius and Benítez-Llambay, Alejandro and Deason, Alis J. and Frenk, Carlos S. and Fattahi, Azadeh and Gómez, Facundo A. and Grand, Robert J.J. and Oman, Kyle A. and Navarro, Julio F. and Simpson, Christine M. (2020) 'The Milky Way total mass profile as inferred from Gaia DR2.', Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society., 494 (3). pp. 4291-4313.


We determine the Milky Way (MW) mass profile inferred from fitting physically motivated models to the Gaia DR2 Galactic rotation curve and other data. Using various hydrodynamical simulations of MW-mass haloes, we show that the presence of baryons induces a contraction of the dark matter (DM) distribution in the inner regions, r . 20 kpc. We provide an analytic expression that relates the baryonic distribution to the change in the DM halo profile. For our galaxy, the contraction increases the enclosed DM halo mass by factors of roughly 1.3, 2 and 4 at radial distances of 20, 8 and 1 kpc, respectively compared to an uncontracted halo. Ignoring this contraction results in systematic biases in the inferred halo mass and concentration. We provide a best-fitting contracted NFW halo model to the MW rotation curve that matches the data very well†. The best-fit has a DM halo mass, MDM 200 = 0.97+0.24 −0.19×1012 M, and concentration before baryon contraction of 9.4 +1.9 −2.6 , which lie close to the median halo mass–concentration relation predicted in ΛCDM. The inferred total mass, Mtotal 200 = 1.08+0.20 −0.14 × 1012 M, is in good agreement with recent measurements. The model gives a MW stellar mass of 5.04+0.43 −0.52 × 1010 M and infers that the DM density at the Solar position is ρ DM = 8.8 +0.5 −0.5 ×10−3 M pc−3 ≡ 0.33+0.02 −0.02 GeV cm−3 . The rotation curve data can also be fitted with an uncontracted NFW halo model, but with very different DM and stellar parameters. The observations prefer the physically motivated contracted NFW halo, but the measurement uncertainties are too large to rule out the uncontracted NFW halo.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF
Full text:(VoR) Version of Record
Download PDF
Publisher Web site:
Publisher statement:This article has been accepted for publication in Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. ©: 2020 The Author(s) . Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
Date accepted:08 April 2020
Date deposited:20 April 2020
Date of first online publication:17 April 2020
Date first made open access:20 April 2020

Save or Share this output

Look up in GoogleScholar