Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Claiming the wilderness in late Roman Gaul

Clay, John-Henry

Claiming the wilderness in late Roman Gaul Thumbnail


Authors

John-Henry Clay



Abstract

The enthusiasm with which Christian authors of late Roman Gaul adopted the ideal of desert asceticism is well known. There is also general agreement that the appeal of the wilderness was, for many of these individuals, more rhetorical than actual. What has not been fully acknowledged is the extent to which their attitudes to wilderness were influenced by classical thought in addition to biblical and hagiographical literature. To the educated classical mind, the cosmos was built on a fundamental dichotomy between order and chaos that permeated the physical and natural world. Wilderness, in its raw natural form, was a manifestation of chaos, while human civilization reflected the principles of order. The argument of this article is that this dichotomy, thanks to a tradition of classical education, helped structure the response of educated Gallo-Romans to the Christian desert tradition as its ideals spread to the west. Despite the appeal of monastic asceticism per se, its association with the desert provoked suspicion among those who had been trained to regard wilderness as the antithesis of civilization and culture. It is, however, possible to detect an evolution in attitudes over the last century of Roman rule in Gaul, as successive generations responded to social and political transformations and, drawing on both Christian and classical tradition, developed new ways of relating to the natural world.

Citation

Clay, J. (2022). Claiming the wilderness in late Roman Gaul. Journal of Early Christian Studies, 30(3), 403-432. https://doi.org/10.1353/earl.2022.0026

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Dec 8, 2019
Online Publication Date Aug 30, 2022
Publication Date 2022
Deposit Date May 16, 2020
Publicly Available Date May 19, 2020
Journal Journal of Early Christian Studies
Print ISSN 1086-3184
Electronic ISSN 1086-3184
Publisher Johns Hopkins University Press
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 30
Issue 3
Pages 403-432
DOI https://doi.org/10.1353/earl.2022.0026

Files

Accepted Journal Article (295 Kb)
PDF

Copyright Statement
Copyright © 2022 The Johns Hopkins University Press. This article first appeared in Journal of Early Christian Studies, Volume 30, Issue 3, Fall 2022, pages 403-422.




You might also like



Downloadable Citations