Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Chytrid infection in Asia : how much do we know and what else do we need to know?

Rahman, Md. Mokhlesur (2020) 'Chytrid infection in Asia : how much do we know and what else do we need to know?', Herpetological journal., 30 (2). pp. 99-111.

Abstract

We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the knowledge base for amphibian chytrid Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) infection in the continent of Asia. Despite an indication of geographic bias in terms of studying chytrid fungus distribution in Asia, 167 amphibian species (145 spp. native to Asia) from 16 countries have been reported as infected with Bd. Our meta-analysis shows that overall prevalence is 8.19 % (out of 28,433 samples), and Bd-positive rate in amphibia significantly varies among sampling sources (χ2= 380.57, DF= 6, P< 0.001) and age categories (χ2= 22.09, DF= 2, P< 0.001). We used Kernel Density analysis to produce a hotspot map for chytrid infection, and Digital Elevation Model to understand the distribution of chytrid positive locations across different elevations. In our meta-analysis, most of the Bd-positive sites range between 4.45–27.49 °C, 167–4,353 mm rainfall, 10–40°N, and at lower elevations ( Bd across Asia. Although no mass die-off events have been reported so far, Maximum Entropy modelling shows that Bd distribution and infection may potentially occur across a vast region of south-east Asia. In conclusion, we call for more systematic research and monitoring strategies in place for countries with little to no information, but have a moderately higher risk of chytrid distribution and infection.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(VoR) Version of Record
Download PDF
(3026Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:https://doi.org/10.33256/hj30.2.99111
Date accepted:09 December 2019
Date deposited:11 June 2020
Date of first online publication:01 April 2020
Date first made open access:11 June 2020

Save or Share this output

Export:
Export
Look up in GoogleScholar