We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Durham Research Online
You are in:

Closed material procedures in the radicalisation cases.

Blackbourn, Jessie (2020) 'Closed material procedures in the radicalisation cases.', Child and family law quarterly., 32 (4).


Closed material procedures were originally introduced in the UK to enable courts to hear national security sensitive information in immigration cases in the absence of the non-government party and their lawyer. They were subsequently extended to the counter-terrorism context and, ultimately, to all civil proceedings under the Justice and Security Act 2013. However, they were not made available for use in the Family Court, and until recently, have only been used in very limited and exceptional circumstances. The case of Re X, Y and Z (Disclosure to the Security Service) [2016] EWHC 2400 (Fam) has potentially opened the Family Court up to using closed material procedures in cases concerning the radicalisation of children. This article briefly explores the importance of that case. It then outlines the history and development of closed material procedures in the UK to set the case in its broader legal context before considering the potential impact of the case on the administration of justice in the family jurisdiction and the rule of law.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Available under License - Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.
Download PDF
Publisher Web site:
Publisher statement:This article will be published under a Creative Commons CC-BY-NC licence.
Date accepted:10 July 2020
Date deposited:25 August 2020
Date of first online publication:13 July 2020
Date first made open access:22 July 2022

Save or Share this output

Look up in GoogleScholar