Xu, Cora Lingling (2018) 'Transborder habitus in a within-country mobility context : a Bourdieusian analysis of mainland Chinese students in Hong Kong.', Sociological review., 66 (6). pp. 1128-1144.
This article contributes to the updating of Bourdieusian sociology by proposing the notion of ‘transborder habitus’, a necessary extension of ‘habitus’ in a transborder context. ‘Transborder contexts’ refer to spaces that belong politically to the same country, share a deep level of historic cultural and/or ethnic entanglement, but can be ideologically, linguistically and socially divergent. Such transborder contexts present empirical challenges that notions such as ‘habitus’ and ‘transnational habitus’ cannot adequately address. First, the national borderline delineation presumed in ‘habitus’ and ‘transnational habitus’ can no longer account for the intricate and complex within-country border diversities. Second, although dissonances between border-crossing agents’ habitus and their original field have been sparsely noted in existing empirical work, few attempts have been made to offer theoretical accounts for habitus–field dissonances along the axes of religion, ethnicity and ideology. Drawing on in-depth interview data from an ongoing longitudinal study that explores the identity trajectories of 31 mainland Chinese students at a Hong Kong university, this article argues that ‘transborder habitus’ can effectively redress these two identified gaps and will show how it can offer a more adequate explanation in empirical contexts.
|Full text:||(AM) Accepted Manuscript|
Download PDF (578Kb)
|Publisher Web site:||https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026117732669|
|Publisher statement:||Xu, Cora Lingling (2018). Transborder habitus in a within-country mobility context: A Bourdieusian analysis of mainland Chinese students in Hong Kong. The Sociological Review 66(6): 1128-1144. Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) DOI: 10.1177/0038026117732669|
|Date accepted:||22 August 2017|
|Date deposited:||27 August 2020|
|Date of first online publication:||26 September 2017|
|Date first made open access:||27 August 2020|
Save or Share this output
|Look up in GoogleScholar|