Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Cosmotechnics from an Anthropotechnological Perspective

Pavanini, Marco

Cosmotechnics from an Anthropotechnological Perspective Thumbnail


Authors

Profile Image

Marco Pavanini marco.pavanini@durham.ac.uk
PGR Student Doctor of Philosophy



Abstract

Yuk Hui’s concept of cosmotechnics provides us with an excellent theoretical device to investigate the role of technology in relation to a culture’s self-understanding. This paper, in the first place, aims to contextualise Hui’s reflexion on cosmotechnics within the broader field of contemporary philosophy of technology, outlining its discerning potential in undermining the outworn, Western dichotomy between nature and culture. In this spirit, it is stressed how cosmotechnics nicely fits in an anthropotechnological perspective, i.e., an understanding of the relation between technics and humans as originary and constitutive. In the second place, the goal of this paper is to evaluate the explanatory significance of the concept of cosmotechnics regarding the possibility of a comparative investigation of the modes according to which different cultures conceive technics and their relation to it. In this spirit, the concept of cultural techniques, i.e., scriptural, figurative and computing techniques embedded with a self-representative potential, is brought about in order to show which kind of technologies are most likely to determine and influence a culture’s self-understanding and should therefore be privileged by the focus of a comparative cosmotechnical inquiry.

Citation

Pavanini, M. (2020). Cosmotechnics from an Anthropotechnological Perspective. Angelaki: Journal of Theoretical Humanities, 25(4), 26-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969725x.2020.1790833

Journal Article Type Article
Online Publication Date Aug 6, 2020
Publication Date 2020
Deposit Date Aug 30, 2020
Publicly Available Date Feb 6, 2022
Journal Angelaki: Journal of Theoretical Humanities
Print ISSN 0969-725X
Electronic ISSN 1469-2899
Publisher Taylor and Francis Group
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 25
Issue 4
Pages 26-38
DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/0969725x.2020.1790833

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations