Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Judicial review and ombuds : a systematic analysis.

Kirkham, R. and O'Loughlin, E.A. (2020) 'Judicial review and ombuds : a systematic analysis.', Public law. (10). pp. 680-700.

Abstract

Presents a study of the courts' approach to reviewing the decisions of ombudsmen. Examines key features of the parties' relationship, the applicable principles of administrative law, the methodology of the survey, and its main findings on issues such as the role of statutory interpretation and the use of judicial creativity. Details the grounds on which decisions may be quashed, the uses of precedent, and the main lessons of the study.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF
(681Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:https://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/Catalogue/ProductDetails.aspx?productid=30791427&recordid=469
Publisher statement:This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Public Law following peer review. The definitive published version Kirkham, R & O'Loughlin, EA (2020). Judicial Review and Ombuds: A Systematic Analysis. Public Law October : 680-700 is available online on Westlaw UK or from Thomson Reuters DocDel service.
Date accepted:21 February 2020
Date deposited:26 September 2020
Date of first online publication:01 October 2020
Date first made open access:14 September 2021

Save or Share this output

Export:
Export
Look up in GoogleScholar