Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Interpreting impoliteness and over-politeness: An investigation into interpreters' cognitive effort, coping strategies and their effects

Xiang, Xia; Zheng, Binghan; Feng, Dezheng

Interpreting impoliteness and over-politeness: An investigation into interpreters' cognitive effort, coping strategies and their effects Thumbnail


Authors

Xia Xiang

Dezheng Feng



Abstract

This paper investigates how politeness is treated in interpreter-mediated events and how the treatment is related to interpreters' pragmatic competence. An empirical study was conducted for this purpose, in which twenty-two professional and student interpreters were asked to work in a liaison interpreting mode. An analysis of the interpreters' cognitive effort involved (i.e. the interpreting process) and the coping strategies employed (i.e. the interpreting product) in dealing with impolite and over-polite utterances, together with their retrospections, produced three findings: 1) Impolite and over-polite utterances slowed down the processing speed of interpreting, indicating that more cognitive effort was involved. Professionals were particularly affected when interpreting from English to Chinese, students the opposite direction. 2) Various coping strategies beyond literal interpreting were adopted by both groups. Professionals used coping strategies more liberally and intentionally than students, especially syntactic ones and omission. 3) The overriding majority of the strategies succeeded in mitigating the face-threatening force implied in the utterances. The differences between the two groups are explained by their different levels of intercultural pragmatic competence. This study contributes to the interlingual and cross-cultural study of politeness, and the exploration of the complexity of the interpreter's role.

Citation

Xiang, X., Zheng, B., & Feng, D. (2020). Interpreting impoliteness and over-politeness: An investigation into interpreters' cognitive effort, coping strategies and their effects. Journal of Pragmatics, 169, 231-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.021

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Sep 15, 2020
Online Publication Date Oct 7, 2020
Publication Date 2020-11
Deposit Date Oct 8, 2020
Publicly Available Date Oct 7, 2021
Journal Journal of Pragmatics
Print ISSN 0378-2166
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 169
Pages 231-244
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.021

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations