Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

What are the career implications of 'seeing eye to eye'? examining the role of leader-member exchange (LMX) agreement on employability and career outcomes.

Epitropaki, Olga and Marstand, Anders Friis and van der Heijden, Beatrice and Bozionelos, Nikos and Mylonopoulos, Nikolaos and van der Heijde, Claudia M. and Scholarios, Dora and Mikkelsen, Aslaug and Marzec, Izabela and Jędrzejowicz, Piotr and Group, The Indicator 'What are the career implications of 'seeing eye to eye'? examining the role of leader-member exchange (LMX) agreement on employability and career outcomes.', Personnel psychology. .

Abstract

Are there career benefits to leaders and followers agreeing about the quality of their leader‐member exchange (LMX) relationship? Is LMX disagreement always detrimental for a follower's career? Can the examination of LMX agreement as a substantive variable help us cast new light on some of the inconclusive findings of past research on LMX and career outcomes? These questions motivate our research. Using theories of social exchange and sponsorship, and responses from 967 leader–follower dyads of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) professionals in seven European countries, we examined the role of LMX agreement on subjective and objective career outcomes. After conducting polynomial regression combined with response surface analysis, we found that both follower‐rated and leader‐rated employability were higher when the leader agreed with the follower at a high level of LMX (versus a low level of LMX). In case of disagreement, strong support was found for leader‐rated employability being higher when the leader's perceptions of LMX exceeded those of their follower. Furthermore, follower‐rated employability was found to mediate the relationship between LMX (dis)agreement and perceived career success, promotions, salary, and bonuses. Support was also found for the mediating role of leader‐rated employability in the case of perceived career success, promotions, and salary but not for bonuses. Our findings highlight the importance of LMX (dis)agreement for career outcomes and further point to the possibility of employability offering an alternative explanation for the mixed findings of past LMX‐career research.

Item Type:Article
Full text:Publisher-imposed embargo
(AM) Accepted Manuscript
File format - PDF
(972Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12432
Date accepted:16 October 2020
Date deposited:20 October 2020
Date of first online publication:No date available
Date first made open access:No date available

Save or Share this output

Export:
Export
Look up in GoogleScholar