Ditonto, Tessa (2017) 'A high bar or a double standard? Gender, competence, and information in political campaigns.', Political Behavior, 39 (2). pp. 301-325.
This study seeks to determine whether subjects in two dynamic process tracing experiments react differently to information related to a candidate’s competence when that candidate is a woman, vs. when he is a man. I find that subjects evaluate a candidate whose competence is in doubt less favorably, and are less likely to vote for the candidate, when she is a woman. In general, evaluations of women seem to be influenced much more by information related to their competence than are evaluations of men. I also find that competence as portrayed by the composition of a candidate’s facial features does not alter this relationship. My findings suggest that gender-based stereotypes may have an indirect effect on candidate evaluations and vote choice by influencing how voters react to information about them.
|Full text:||(AM) Accepted Manuscript|
Download PDF (796Kb)
|Publisher Web site:||https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-016-9357-5|
|Publisher statement:||This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Political Behaviour. The final authenticated version is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11109-016-9357-5.|
|Date accepted:||No date available|
|Date deposited:||04 January 2021|
|Date of first online publication:||04 August 2016|
|Date first made open access:||04 January 2021|
Save or Share this output
|Look up in GoogleScholar|