Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

A high bar or a double standard? Gender, competence, and information in political campaigns.

Ditonto, Tessa (2017) 'A high bar or a double standard? Gender, competence, and information in political campaigns.', Political Behavior, 39 (2). pp. 301-325.

Abstract

This study seeks to determine whether subjects in two dynamic process tracing experiments react differently to information related to a candidate’s competence when that candidate is a woman, vs. when he is a man. I find that subjects evaluate a candidate whose competence is in doubt less favorably, and are less likely to vote for the candidate, when she is a woman. In general, evaluations of women seem to be influenced much more by information related to their competence than are evaluations of men. I also find that competence as portrayed by the composition of a candidate’s facial features does not alter this relationship. My findings suggest that gender-based stereotypes may have an indirect effect on candidate evaluations and vote choice by influencing how voters react to information about them.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF
(796Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-016-9357-5
Publisher statement:This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Political Behaviour. The final authenticated version is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11109-016-9357-5.
Date accepted:No date available
Date deposited:04 January 2021
Date of first online publication:04 August 2016
Date first made open access:04 January 2021

Save or Share this output

Export:
Export
Look up in GoogleScholar