We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Durham Research Online
You are in:

Who Makes the City? Beijing’s Urban Villages as Sites of Ideological Contestation.

Hayward, Jane and Jakimów, Małgorzata (2022) 'Who Makes the City? Beijing’s Urban Villages as Sites of Ideological Contestation.', positions: asia critique, 30 (3). pp. 455-477.


Inside Beijing are hundreds of urban villages. Originally farming villages, now engulfed by urban expansion, they persist due to China's segregated urban-rural property system. Inhabitants are often still classed as 'peasants', despite being inside the city. Since most have had their agricultural land requisitioned for urban construction, they instead build multiple extensions to their houses to rent to rural migrants seeking cheap accommodation. In some cases, village populations have increased ten-fold as migrants have flooded in, causing cramped conditions and overloading village infrastructure. Urban villages have in recent years emerged as key sites of ideological and political contestation. For local officials and planners envisioning gleaming world cities brimming with advanced technology and highly skilled workers, these are dirty and backward 'urban cancers', enclaves of the ‘low-end population’, and obstacles to their visions of the city as embodiment of global modernity. An opposing set of scholars and policymakers view these villages as essential to city life, channels for low-cost labour to service urban elites, and gateways to modernity for those formerly excluded. Within the urban villages, groups of migrant-activists defy the statist vision of the city. Through cultural performances and visual representations, they struggle to promote an urban modernity in which they are included as active participants. This paper explores how Beijing's urban villages constitute a key site of ideological contestation over what the city should be, and whom urban life is for.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF
Publisher Web site:
Date accepted:08 January 2021
Date deposited:09 February 2021
Date of first online publication:01 August 2022
Date first made open access:14 September 2022

Save or Share this output

Look up in GoogleScholar