Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Global inequities and political borders challenge nature conservation under climate change

Titley, Mark A. and Butchart, Stuart H. M. and Jones, Victoria R. and Whittingham, Mark J. and Willis, Stephen G. (2021) 'Global inequities and political borders challenge nature conservation under climate change.', Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118 (7). e2011204118.

Abstract

Underlying sociopolitical factors have emerged as important determinants of wildlife population trends and the effectiveness of conservation action. Despite mounting research into the impacts of climate change on nature, there has been little consideration of the human context in which these impacts occur, particularly at the global scale. We investigate this in two ways. First, by modeling the climatic niches of terrestrial mammals and birds globally, we show that projected species loss under climate change is greatest in countries with weaker governance and lower Gross Domestic Product, with loss of mammal species projected to be greater in countries with lower CO2 emissions. Therefore, climate change impacts on species may be disproportionately significant in countries with lower capacity for effective conservation and lower greenhouse gas emissions, raising important questions of international justice. Second, we consider the redistribution of species in the context of political boundaries since the global importance of transboundary conservation under climate change is poorly understood. Under a high-emissions scenario, we find that 35% of mammals and 29% of birds are projected to have over half of their 2070 climatic niche in countries in which they are not currently found. We map these transboundary range shifts globally, identifying borders across which international coordination might most benefit conservation and where physical border barriers, such as walls and fences, may be an overlooked obstacle to climate adaptation. Our work highlights the importance of sociopolitical context and the utility of a supranational perspective for 21st century nature conservation.

Item Type:Article
Keywords:climate change, biodiversity, transboundary, conservation, political borders
Full text:Publisher-imposed embargo
(AM) Accepted Manuscript
File format - PDF (Accepted Manuscript and Supplementary Information)
(2467Kb)
Full text:(VoR) Version of Record
Available under License - Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.
Download PDF
(1254Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2011204118
Publisher statement:This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY).
Date accepted:17 December 2020
Date deposited:10 February 2021
Date of first online publication:08 February 2021
Date first made open access:10 February 2021

Save or Share this output

Export:
Export
Look up in GoogleScholar