Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Implicit Bias and Epistemic Oppression in Confronting Racism

Holroyd, Jules and Puddifoot, Katherine (2021) 'Implicit Bias and Epistemic Oppression in Confronting Racism.', Journal of the American Philosophical Association. .

Abstract

Motivating reforms to address discrimination and exclusion is important. But what epistemic practices characterise better or worse ways of doing this? Recently, the phenomena of implicit biases have played a large role in motivating reforms. We argue that this strategy risks perpetuating two kinds of epistemic oppression: the vindication dynamic and contributory injustice. We offer positive proposals for avoiding these forms of epistemic oppression when confronting racism.

Item Type:Article
Full text:Publisher-imposed embargo
(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Available under License - Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
File format - PDF
(230Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-the-american-philosophical-association
Publisher statement:This version is published under a Creative Commons CC-BY-NC-ND. No commercial re-distribution or re-use allowed. Derivative works cannot be distributed.
Date accepted:20 March 2021
Date deposited:07 April 2021
Date of first online publication:2021
Date first made open access:No date available

Save or Share this output

Export:
Export
Look up in GoogleScholar