Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Concealment of Birth: Time to Repeal a 200-Year-Old “Convenient Stop-Gap”?

Milne, Emma (2019) 'Concealment of Birth: Time to Repeal a 200-Year-Old “Convenient Stop-Gap”?', Feminist Legal Studies, 27 (2). pp. 139-162.

Abstract

Feminists have long argued that women who offend are judged by who they are, not what they do, with idealised images of femininity and motherhood used as measures of culpability. The ability to meet the expectations of motherhood and femininity are particularly difficult for women who experience a crisis pregnancy, as evident in cases where women have been convicted of concealment of birth. The offence prohibits the secret disposal of the dead body of a child, to conceal knowledge of its birth. Traditionally used to prosecute women suspected of killing their newborn children, analysis of court transcripts suggests the offence is also used to punish women who fail to meet expectations of motherhood. This paper analyses three contemporary cases in light of the historical origins of the offence, illustrating the legacy of prejudice against ‘deviant’ mothers. Finally, it questions the continued existence of this archaic offence.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF
(410Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-019-09401-6
Publisher statement:This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of a journal article published in Feminist Legal Studies. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-019-09401-6
Date accepted:08 March 2019
Date deposited:08 October 2021
Date of first online publication:11 May 2019
Date first made open access:08 October 2021

Save or Share this output

Export:
Export
Look up in GoogleScholar