Liburd, Liam and Jackson, Paul (2021) 'Debate: Decolonising Fascist Studies.', Fascism., 10 (2). pp. 323-345.
Abstract
The drive to decolonise is of central importance to the study of fascism, which after all was and remains a politics rooted in specific conceptions of colonialism and race. In this article, we have invited both leading academics and early career scholars to reflect on how we might ‘decolonise’ fascist studies. Their comments approach fascism in a range of contexts, and offer reflections on how to frame future research questions, approach methodological issues, and consider how fascism studies might develop a more overt and clear stance on the problems posed by decolonising the subject area more broadly. It is hoped that these commentaries will enrich the field of fascist studies and, in turn, do more to relate it to the work of scholars in other relevant areas of study, particularly those working on critical theories of race and racism. Contributors to this debate are: Leslie James, Raul Carstocea, Daniel Hedinger, Liam J. Liburd, Cathy Bergin, Benjamin Bland, Evan Smith, Jonathan Hyslop, Benjamin Zachariah, and Caroline Campbell.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Full text: | (VoR) Version of Record Available under License - Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. Download PDF (285Kb) |
Status: | Peer-reviewed |
Publisher Web site: | https://doi.org/10.1163/22116257-bja10039 |
Publisher statement: | © Liam Liburd and Paul Jackson, 2021 | doi:10.1163/22116257-bja10039 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the cc by 4.0 license |
Date accepted: | 27 October 2021 |
Date deposited: | 10 February 2022 |
Date of first online publication: | 26 November 2021 |
Date first made open access: | 10 February 2022 |
Save or Share this output
Export: | |
Look up in GoogleScholar |