Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Can the gap get any wider? How the new GCSE curriculum will make progression to university more challenging and less inclusive

Cazzoli, Marcela A.

Can the gap get any wider? How the new GCSE curriculum will make progression to university more challenging and less inclusive Thumbnail


Authors



Abstract

The latest reforms to the GCSE Subject Content attempt to bring languages in line with other subject areas through a quantification of the material that needs to be learnt and a focus on the linguistic system, to the detriment of the broader communicative aims associated with ‘knowing a language’. This article suggests that the reforms expose a lack of understanding of the fact that curricula based on instrumental skills do not prepare students (from state schools, in particular) for the level of reflection and intellectual enquiry that is at the core of university learning. This paper will also argue that an instrumental view of languages creates a wider gap between school and university that perpetuates inequality and that keeps promoting an Anglocentric public idea about languages. In order to mitigate the impact of the latest GCSE reforms, it is proposed that higher education institutions and schools should engage in collaborative work towards an understanding of language education that takes account of some of the principles which now inform languages curriculum reform in higher education in the UK and also in other sectors in Europe via the CEFR.

Citation

Cazzoli, M. A. (2022). Can the gap get any wider? How the new GCSE curriculum will make progression to university more challenging and less inclusive. The Language Learning Journal, 50(2), 268-272. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2022.2046382

Journal Article Type Article
Online Publication Date Mar 15, 2022
Publication Date 2022
Deposit Date Mar 17, 2022
Publicly Available Date May 23, 2022
Journal Language Learning Journal
Print ISSN 0957-1736
Electronic ISSN 1753-2167
Publisher Taylor and Francis Group
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 50
Issue 2
Pages 268-272
DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2022.2046382

Files

Published Journal Article (874 Kb)
PDF

Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Copyright Statement
© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.




You might also like



Downloadable Citations