Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Apostle-Auriga: effects of different subgrid models on the baryon cycle around Milky Way-mass galaxies

Kelly, Ashley J. and Jenkins, Adrian and Deason, Alis and Fattahi, Azadeh and Grand, Robert J.J. and Pakmor, Rüdiger and Springel, Volker and Frenk, Carlos S. (2022) 'Apostle-Auriga: effects of different subgrid models on the baryon cycle around Milky Way-mass galaxies.', Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 514 (3). pp. 3113-3138.

Abstract

Modern hydrodynamical simulations reproduce many properties of the real universe. These simulations model various physical processes, but many of these are included using ‘subgrid models’ due to resolution limits. Although different subgrid models have been successful in modelling the effects of supernovae (SNe) and active galactic nuclei (AGN) feedback on galactic properties, it remains unclear if, and by how much, these differing implementations affect observable halo gas properties. In this work, we use ‘zoom-in’ cosmological initial conditions of two volumes selected to resemble the Local Group (LG) evolved with both the AURIGA and APOSTLE galaxy formation models. While the subgrid physics models in both simulations reproduce realistic stellar components of L⋆ galaxies, they exhibit different gas properties. Namely, AURIGA predicts that the Milky Way (MW) is almost baryonically closed, whereas APOSTLE suggests that only half of the expected baryons reside within the halo. Furthermore, APOSTLE predicts that this baryon deficiency extends to the LG, (r ≤ 1 Mpc). Some of the baryon deficiency in APOSTLE is due to SNe feedback at high redshift, which generates halo-wide outflows, with high covering fractions and radial velocities, which both eject baryons and significantly impede cosmic gas accretion. Conversely, in AURIGA, gas accretion into the halo appears to be almost unaffected by feedback. These differences appear to result from the different energy injection methods from feedback (both SNe and AGN) to gas. Our results suggest that both quasar absorption lines and fast radio burst dispersion measures could constrain these two regimes with future observations.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Available under License - Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.
Download PDF
(13761Kb)
Full text:(VoR) Version of Record
Available under License - Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.
Download PDF
(4297Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac1019
Publisher statement:© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Astronomical Society. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Date accepted:15 March 2022
Date deposited:26 May 2022
Date of first online publication:14 April 2022
Date first made open access:26 May 2022

Save or Share this output

Export:
Export
Look up in GoogleScholar