The end of (reproductive) liberty as we know it: A note on Dobbs V. Jackson Women’s Health 597 USC __ (2022)

Romanis, Elizabeth Chloe

doi:10.1177/09685332231154562

The end of (reproductive) liberty as we know it: A note on Dobbs V. Jackson Women’s Health 597 USC __ (2022)

Romanis, Elizabeth Chloe

Authors

Dr Chloe Romanis elizabeth.c.romanis@durham.ac.uk
Associate Professor

Abstract

In Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health, a 6–3 majority of the US Supreme Court overturned 50 years of established precedent, ruling that the Constitution confers no right to abortion. Since first recognition that the constitutional right to privacy encompassed a (negative) right to pre-viability abortion in 1973, Supreme Court decisions have slowly chipped away at the substance of this right. Dobbs, however, marks a significant shift in abortion (and general) jurisprudence, by deploying an originalist interpretation of the constitution to deny that such a right exists. Consequently, States may now regulate abortion how they see fit, including by introducing complete prohibitions. This note illustrates how Dobbs has dire consequences for reproductive freedom as we have known it, with disastrous legal and practical ramifications for abortion-seekers, pregnant people, and all people with the physiology to become pregnant. Furthermore, the Court’s use of an originalist approach to rescind a constitutional protection signals further moves to derecognise other rights such as contraception, as well as same-sex intimacy.

Citation

Romanis, E. C. (2023). The end of (reproductive) liberty as we know it: A note on Dobbs V. Jackson Women’s Health 597 USC __ (2022). Medical Law International, 23(1), https://doi.org/10.1177/09685332231154562

Journal Article Type	Commentary
Acceptance Date	Dec 20, 2022
Online Publication Date	Mar 14, 2023
Publication Date	2023
Deposit Date	Apr 13, 2023
Publicly Available Date	Apr 13, 2023
Journal	Medical Law International
Print ISSN	0968-5332
Electronic ISSN	2047-9441
Publisher	SAGE Publications
Peer Reviewed	Peer Reviewed
Volume	23
Issue	1
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1177/09685332231154562
Public URL	https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1176548

Files

Published Journal Article (164 Kb)
PDF

Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Copyright Statement
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).