Fenwick, H. M. and Phillipson, G. (2001) 'Direct action, convention values and the Human Rights Act.', Legal studies., 21 (4). pp. 535-568.
The direct action form of protest is becoming an increasingly significant form of political expression. This paper considers such protest in relation to the guarantees of free expression and peaceful assembly under arts 10 and 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights, now binding on United Kingdom public authorities under the Human Rights Act 1998. Its aim is to set out a framework of principle which would guide and underpin judicial approaches to the application of the Convention to domestic criminal law aimed at such protest, specifically ss 68 and 69 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994. It argues that, because of the deficiencies of the Strasbourg case law in this area, an activist judicial stance, one reliant on underlying Convention values, will be required if there is to be any significant change to the traditional, illiberal domestic approach to direct action.
|Full text:||Full text not available from this repository.|
|Publisher Web site:||http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.2001.tb00180.x|
|Date accepted:||No date available|
|Date deposited:||No date available|
|Date of first online publication:||November 2001|
|Date first made open access:||No date available|
Save or Share this output
|Look up in GoogleScholar|