We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Durham Research Online
You are in:

Augustus, Domitian, and the so-called Horologium Augusti.

Heslin, P. J. (2007) 'Augustus, Domitian, and the so-called Horologium Augusti.', Journal of Roman studies., 97 . pp. 1-20.


Buchner’s reconstruction of the Horologium Augusti continues to be influential, despite fatal flaws demonstrated by Rodrίguez-Almeida and Schütz; so we begin by reviewing the state of the evidence. There is no credible indication that Augustus or his successors built an extensive sundial, so we must conclude with Schütz that what Pliny described and what the excavations of the German Archaeological Institute (DAI) uncovered was a solar meridian line. We then proceed to discuss its significance in the context of the Augustan building programme. Since the DAI in fact discovered a Flavian reconstruction, the final question to be addressed is what purpose it served Domitian to rebuild a largely symbolic Augustan instrument that had grown inaccurate over time.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(VoR) Version of Record
Download PDF
Publisher Web site:
Date accepted:No date available
Date deposited:20 January 2010
Date of first online publication:November 2007
Date first made open access:No date available

Save or Share this output

Look up in GoogleScholar