Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Local governance and concrete research: investigating the uneven development of regulation

Painter, J.; Goodwin, M.

Authors

M. Goodwin



Abstract

This paper considers some of the methodological implications of regulation theory in relation to our current research into the restructuring of the institutions and practices of local governance in Britain during the 1990s. We propose that a methodological approach to regulation theory avoids some of the difficulties associated with the current widespread use of concepts such as the 'mode of regulation'. Emphasizing the social practices which constitute ongoing regulatory processes, we suggest, focuses attention on the geography of regulation, its organization through sites and institutions and requires that full weight be given to the process of concrete research. This approach, which draws on, and is compatible with, the epistemology of critical realism, avoids both teleology and functionalism. However, it also calls into question the coherence and homogeneity of modes of regulation. The paper concludes with an outline of the concrete research strategy we have adopted in our investigation of local governance.

Citation

Painter, J., & Goodwin, M. (1995). Local governance and concrete research: investigating the uneven development of regulation. Economy and Society, 24(3), 334-356. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085149500000014

Journal Article Type Article
Publication Date Jan 1, 1995
Deposit Date Mar 6, 2009
Journal Economy and Society
Print ISSN 0308-5147
Electronic ISSN 1469-5766
Publisher Taylor and Francis Group
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 24
Issue 3
Pages 334-356
DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/03085149500000014