Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

The Cochrane Library: more systematic reviews on nutrition needed

Summerbell, C.D.; Chinnock, P.; O'Malley, C.; van Binsbergen, J.J.

Authors

P. Chinnock

J.J. van Binsbergen



Abstract

The knowledge and relevance of nutrition as well as the demand for well-funded advices increase. The Cochrane Collaboration plays a leading role within the evidence-based medicine and practice. We advocate therefore more specialized nutritional interest within the Cochrane Collaboration. In case 'Nutrition' needs more attention within the Cochrane Library, one of the first priorities is deciding about whether to include non-randomized studies into the Specialized Register and generating lists of journals to handsearch for such a Specialized Register. Preparatory to these activities an inventory of Nutritional content within the Cochrane Library is needed. We estimate that reviews directly related to nutrition and those of borderline interest to nutrition represent less than 4% of all published reviews in The Cochrane Library.

Citation

Summerbell, C., Chinnock, P., O'Malley, C., & van Binsbergen, J. (2005). The Cochrane Library: more systematic reviews on nutrition needed. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 59(Supplement 1), S172-178. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602193

Journal Article Type Article
Publication Date Aug 1, 2005
Deposit Date Jun 10, 2009
Journal European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Print ISSN 0954-3007
Electronic ISSN 1476-5640
Publisher Springer Nature [academic journals on nature.com]
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 59
Issue Supplement 1
Pages S172-178
DOI https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602193
Public URL https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1550416