Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

A Comparison of Students' Evaluations of a Peer-delivered Sex Education Programme and Teacher-led Provision

Forrest, S.; Strange, V.; Oakley, A.; team, & the RIPPLE

Authors

V. Strange

A. Oakley

& the RIPPLE team



Abstract

This article reports data from the process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial of peer-led sex education in English secondary schools. Data from 52 focus group discussions in 19 schools and selected items from a questionnaire survey completed by 7770 students in 1998/99 are used to compare student views on teacher- and peer-led sex education. Questionnaire data show that a significantly greater proportion of students taught by peer educators than teachers felt that sex education was enjoyable, engaging and useful to them. Data also show that a slightly greater proportion of students taught by teachers felt the classroom was well controlled. Data from an analysis of the focus group discussions are used to explore and illustrate factors which students associated with the acceptability and satisfaction of the peer-led intervention. The importance of peer educator empathy and similarity with students is highlighted and data show how these characteristics are associated with peer educators' choice of teaching methods, the content of lessons and the sexual values and attitudes they espouse. The influence of contextual factors like student prior expectations and experiences of relationships with teachers, school environment and norms are considered along with the potential influence of the research process on responses.

Citation

Forrest, S., Strange, V., Oakley, A., & team, &. T. R. (2002). A Comparison of Students' Evaluations of a Peer-delivered Sex Education Programme and Teacher-led Provision. Sex Education: Sexuality, Society and Learning, 2(3), 195-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/1468181022000025776

Journal Article Type Article
Publication Date Nov 1, 2002
Deposit Date Jun 24, 2009
Journal Sex Education: Sexuality, Society and Learning
Print ISSN 1468-1811
Electronic ISSN 1472-0825
Publisher Taylor and Francis Group
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 2
Issue 3
Pages 195-214
DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/1468181022000025776