We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Durham Research Online
You are in:

Evaluating processes : a case study of a randomized controlled trial of sex education.

Oakley, A. and Strange, V. and Stephenson, J. and Forrest, S. and Monteiro, H. and RIPPLE Study Team., (2004) 'Evaluating processes : a case study of a randomized controlled trial of sex education.', Evaluation., 10 (4). pp. 440-462.


This article explores the rationales offered in the evaluation literature for studying the processes involved in programme implementation, and their relationship with current arguments about the use of experimental designs to evaluate social interventions. It describes, as a case study, a process evaluation carried out as an integral part of a randomized controlled trial of peer-led sex education. The process evaluation was designed to answer important questions about the implementation of the intervention, the social context of the trial, and the experiences of trial participants. The article describes the methods used to collect process data, and some of the challenges involved. It concludes by arguing that process evaluation is necessarily complex, but essential to the task of understanding why and how interventions and outcomes may be related.

Item Type:Article
Keywords:Evaluation methods, Process evaluation, Randomized.
Full text:Full text not available from this repository.
Publisher Web site:
Date accepted:No date available
Date deposited:No date available
Date of first online publication:October 2004
Date first made open access:No date available

Save or Share this output

Look up in GoogleScholar