We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Durham Research Online
You are in:

Comment on Martinez-Garcia et al. 'Heavy metals in human bones in different historical epochs'.

Millard, A. R. (2006) 'Comment on Martinez-Garcia et al. 'Heavy metals in human bones in different historical epochs'.', Science of the total environment., 354 (2-3). pp. 295-297.


Martínez-García et al. (Sci. Tot Env. 348:51–72) have examined heavy metal exposure of humans in the Cartagena region using analysis of archaeological bones. An analysis of the lead and iron levels they report shows that they are physiologically implausible and must therefore result from diagenesis. This, and analogy with the known diagenetic origin of certain other elements, suggests that the other metal analyses they report are also unlikely to be in vivo concentrations. Lifetime heavy metal exposure cannot be deduced from diagenetically altered concentrations.

Item Type:Article
Keywords:Human bone, Heavy metals, Historical periods, Diagenesis.
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF
Publisher Web site:
Date accepted:No date available
Date deposited:14 December 2009
Date of first online publication:February 2006
Date first made open access:No date available

Save or Share this output

Look up in GoogleScholar