We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Durham Research Online
You are in:

Greedy algorithms, H-colourings and a complexity-theoretic dichotomy.

Puricella, A. and Stewart, I. A. (2003) 'Greedy algorithms, H-colourings and a complexity-theoretic dichotomy.', Theoretical computer science., 290 (3). pp. 1897-1913.


Let H be a fixed undirected graph. An H-colouring of an undirected graph G is a homomorphism from G to H. If the vertices of G are partially ordered then there is a generic non-deterministic greedy algorithm which computes all lexicographically first maximal H-colourable subgraphs of G. We show that the complexity of deciding whether a given vertex of G is in a lexicographically first maximal H-colourable subgraph of G is NP-complete, if H is bipartite, and ${\bf \Sigma}_2^p$-complete, if H is non-bipartite. This result complements Hell and Nesetril's seminal dichotomy result that the standard H-colouring problem is in P, if H is bipartite, and NP-complete, if H is non-bipartite. Our proofs use the basic techniques established by Hell and Nesetril, combinatorially adapted to our scenario.

Item Type:Article
Keywords:Computational complexity, Constraint satisfaction, Graph algorithms, Dicotomies.
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF
Publisher Web site:
Date accepted:No date available
Date deposited:10 October 2008
Date of first online publication:January 2003
Date first made open access:No date available

Save or Share this output

Look up in GoogleScholar