Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Internalism and externalism in ethics applied to the Liberal-Communitarian debate.

Dimova-Cookson, M. (2005) 'Internalism and externalism in ethics applied to the Liberal-Communitarian debate.', British journal of politics and international relations., 7 (1). pp. 18-28.

Abstract

This article addresses the question of whether we can explain moral action in terms of an attraction to a moral ideal. It defends T. H. Green's internalist ethics against John Skorupski's externalist claim that moral ideals are optional whereas moral duties are not. A parallel is drawn between the Internalism and Externalism debate in ethics and the liberal-communitarian debate in political theory. My defence of Internalism offers new arguments in support of communitarian approaches to the nature of moral action. Green's internalist ethics provides the communitarian discourse with the universalist moral dimension it traditionally lacks.

Item Type:Article
Keywords:Moral action, T. H. Green, Gerald Gaus, John Skorupski.
Full text:Full text not available from this repository.
Publisher Web site:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2005.00164.x
Date accepted:No date available
Date deposited:No date available
Date of first online publication:February 2005
Date first made open access:No date available

Save or Share this output

Export:
Export
Look up in GoogleScholar