McGlynn, Clare and Rackley, Erika and Ward, Ian (2009) 'Judging destricted.', King’s law journal., 20 (1). pp. 53-67.
The film Destricted purports to explore the boundaries of art and pornography. Awarded an '18' certificate by the British Board of Film Classification (BBFC), the film nonetheless contains images of sexual violence and childlike sexual activity. In the context of the so-called 'porn wars' of the 1970s and 1980s, this article examines Destricted, challenging the BBFC classification and, in doing so, arguing the case for a regulatory regime that is responsive to the pragmatics as well as the principles of ethical judgement.
|Keywords:||Destricted, Pornography, Feminism.|
|Full text:||Full text not available from this repository.|
|Publisher Web site:||http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/hart/klj/2009/00000020/00000001/art00003|
|Date accepted:||No date available|
|Date deposited:||No date available|
|Date of first online publication:||February 2009|
|Date first made open access:||No date available|
Save or Share this output
|Look up in GoogleScholar|