Tanaka, Mark M. and Kendal, Jeremy R. and Laland, Kevin N. (2009) 'From traditional medicine to witchcraft : why medical treatments are not always efficacious.', PLoS ONE., 4 (4). e5192.
Complementary medicines, traditional remedies and home cures for medical ailments are used extensively world-wide, representing more than US$60 billion sales in the global market. With serious doubts about the efficacy and safety of many treatments, the industry remains steeped in controversy. Little is known about factors affecting the prevalence of efficacious and non-efficacious self-medicative treatments. Here we develop mathematical models which reveal that the most efficacious treatments are not necessarily those most likely to spread. Indeed, purely superstitious remedies, or even maladaptive practices, spread more readily than efficacious treatments under specified circumstances. Low-efficacy practices sometimes spread because their very ineffectiveness results in longer, more salient demonstration and a larger number of converts, which more than compensates for greater rates of abandonment. These models also illuminate a broader range of phenomena, including the spread of innovations, medical treatment of animals, foraging behaviour, and self-medication in non-human primates.
|Full text:||(VoR) Version of Record|
Available under License - Creative Commons Attribution.
Download PDF (497Kb)
|Publisher Web site:||http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005192|
|Publisher statement:||Copyright: © 2009 Tanaka et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.|
|Date accepted:||No date available|
|Date deposited:||24 January 2012|
|Date of first online publication:||15 April 2009|
|Date first made open access:||No date available|
Save or Share this output
|Look up in GoogleScholar|